Reform UK’s online membership counter, set up over the new year to boast as they overtook the Tories, has begun falling after Rupert Lowe’s expulsion. On Saturday afternoon, just shy of 24 hours after Mr Lowe was ousted and reported to the police, the ticker stood at 219,637.
However it flatlined over the weekend, before staff began processing emails from furious supporters demanding their membership be ripped up as a result of Mr Lowe’s treatment. Around three hours later the ticker has fallen to 219,557. However a senior party insider has told the Express that over 2,000 members emailed the party in light of Friday’s shocking events demanding they leave the party and be deleted from its supporter record.
Rupert Lowe’s expulsion has hit Reform’s momentum (Image: Getty)
A Reform UK spokesman denied this figure.
This morning an ally of Mr Lowe told this paper that the Great Yarmouth MP “will not go quiet” following the allegations, in a warning to his former party.
It is not known whether Mr Lowe is among those no longer listed as a member of the party.
The wash-up from last week’s chaos is the first time since the election that Reform has showed a sign of weakness, with the Tories visibly delighted by the split.
A senior member of the Conservative shadow cabinet has revealed they have already been in touch with Mr Lowe, as the official opposition eyes a potential major addition to their ranks.
While they acknowledged Mr Lowe is not very keen on the Tories, they suggested this could change should Reform fully burn its bridges with the MP.
Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more
Invalid email
You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
Reform’s membership ticker has fallen since Saturday (Image: Reform UK)
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp has also been making overtures to the ousted Reform MP, this morning defending him against slanderous claims he is suffering from dementia.
Mr Lowe said he had been informed “by a reliable source that ‘senior Reform figures’ have been briefing journalists that I have dementia… this is sick. What they are doing to me is disgusting.”
Mr Philp described the claim as “despicable behaviour towards Rupert Lowe”.
This weekend deputy leader Richard Tice suggested Mr Lowe may not be welcomed back into the party regardless of the outcome of both an internal bullying inquiry, and a policy investigation into claims he made physical threats against the party’s chairman Zia Yusuf.
Asked if he’ll be welcomed back in the event of an exoneration, Mr Tice refused to be drawn on the matter.
He told GB News: “The whip has been withdrawn, and we want team players that will unite.”
“The whip has been withdrawn, and that should be the assumption. We’re driving forwards. We’re not holding back.
“We’ve got a job to do. We’ve got hundreds of seats to win in May. We’re not going to be distracted by this noise. And you know what? I don’t think the British people will be either.”
Reform UK Membership Falls for First Time After Rupert Lowe Expulsion
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK faced an early test of party unity after its decision to expel Rupert Lowe triggered a wave of criticism from some supporters and renewed questions about the organisation’s internal leadership.
The dispute was particularly sensitive because Reform had built much of its political momentum around presenting itself as a fresh alternative to Britain’s established parties. Its growing membership was an important part of that message, helping the party demonstrate that its appeal extended beyond Farage’s personal popularity.
But Lowe’s departure exposed tensions between the leadership and sections of the grassroots membership. Some supporters questioned the way the controversy had been handled, while others defended the party’s right to investigate allegations involving its elected representatives.
The membership figures became a focus of attention because they offered a visible measure of whether the dispute was affecting the party’s ability to retain its supporters.
The fallout from Rupert Lowe’s expulsion
Lowe, the MP for Great Yarmouth, was suspended from Reform in March 2025 following allegations concerning the treatment of staff and an alleged threat against the party’s then-chairman, Zia Yusuf. Lowe denied the allegations and accused the party of conducting a campaign against him.
The dispute quickly escalated beyond an internal disciplinary matter. Farage defended the need to investigate the complaints, while Lowe argued that the action against him was politically motivated.
The controversy attracted attention from other political figures and Reform supporters, some of whom questioned whether the leadership had treated Lowe fairly. The disagreement also raised questions about how a party that had experienced rapid growth would handle internal conflicts.
Reporting by The Guardian at the time described claims from Lowe’s allies that thousands of members had resigned in protest at his treatment. Reform disputed claims about the scale of the departures, and the precise number of people leaving was contested. <Cite refs={[“turn196394search10″,”turn196394search1”]}/>
That distinction is important. Membership changes can reflect genuine dissatisfaction, but claims made by supporters of competing sides should not automatically be treated as verified totals.
Nevertheless, the controversy gave Reform’s leadership a difficult communications problem. Even if the party believed that its procedures were justified, it still had to reassure members that allegations would be investigated fairly and that disagreements would not be resolved simply through public confrontation.
Why membership matters to Reform
Membership is more than a headline figure for a political party. It can help fund operations, provide volunteers, identify potential candidates and demonstrate that a movement has an active base beyond its elected representatives.
For Reform, which has frequently criticised Labour and the Conservatives for losing touch with ordinary voters, membership growth has also been an important part of its public identity.
A rising total can support the argument that people are moving away from established parties and looking for an alternative. A decline, by contrast, can invite questions about whether enthusiasm is weakening or whether internal disputes are damaging confidence.
However, a single fall in membership does not necessarily indicate a lasting reversal. Figures can fluctuate because of renewal dates, administrative changes, cancellations and the timing of political events. To establish a meaningful trend, it is necessary to examine the size and duration of the decline and compare it with previous periods.
The Lowe controversy therefore mattered not simply because of the number of members who might have left, but because of what the dispute revealed about the relationship between Reform’s leadership and its supporters.
A party can attract new members while still experiencing internal dissatisfaction. Equally, some members may remain loyal to a leader even when others leave. The broader picture depends on whether the organisation can maintain participation, recruit new supporters and resolve disputes without repeatedly damaging its public reputation.
A test of Farage’s leadership
Farage has been central to Reform’s political identity for years. His ability to attract media attention and communicate a clear message has helped the party establish itself as a major force in debates about immigration, sovereignty and dissatisfaction with government.
That prominence also means that disputes within the party often become questions about his leadership. When a prominent MP leaves after a public disagreement, the consequences extend beyond the individual involved.
Supporters who agreed with Lowe could interpret his expulsion as evidence that the party was unwilling to tolerate dissent. Others could conclude that the leadership was right to insist on standards of conduct and to investigate complaints rather than allowing an elected representative’s status to shield him from scrutiny.
These are different interpretations of the same political episode. The central question is whether the party’s procedures were sufficiently fair, transparent and credible to maintain the confidence of members on both sides.
Political organisations need the authority to investigate complaints and enforce their rules. They also need safeguards against arbitrary decisions, especially when the people involved are senior figures with their own political followings.
For Reform, the challenge was to show that its disciplinary processes could withstand scrutiny while keeping the organisation focused on its wider political objectives.
Could rival movements benefit?
Lowe’s departure also created an opportunity for politicians seeking to build an alternative to Reform.
In February 2026, he formally launched Restore Britain as a political party, after previously establishing a separate movement. His project has sought to appeal to voters who want a more uncompromising approach to immigration and national sovereignty. <Cite refs={[“turn196394search15″,”turn196394news2”]}/>
The development demonstrated that the dispute with Farage had consequences beyond the original membership controversy. Lowe was no longer simply a former colleague criticising Reform; he was attempting to build an organisation that could compete with it.
Restore Britain could attract some people dissatisfied with Reform’s leadership or policies. Yet establishing a new party requires considerable work. It needs candidates, local campaign teams, funding, a recognisable programme and the ability to persuade voters that it can turn its promises into action.
It also faces the challenge of competing for support with a party that already has a national profile and an established electoral presence.
If two parties appeal to similar voters, their competition can affect results under Britain’s first-past-the-post system. But it would be wrong to assume that every supporter gained by Restore Britain represents a lost Reform voter. Some may previously have supported another party or may not have voted at all.
The scale of any impact would need to be established through reliable membership figures, polling and election results rather than inferred from the existence of a rival organisation alone.
Membership figures require careful interpretation
The political importance of a membership decline depends on its scale, duration and cause.
If a party loses a small number of members during a particularly contentious week but quickly recruits new supporters, the episode may have limited long-term consequences. If cancellations continue over several months, the leadership may need to investigate whether the organisation’s direction or internal culture is alienating its base.
Reform’s membership figures have also been affected by controversies unrelated to Lowe. In June 2025, LBC reported that the party had lost 2,924 members between 2 and 9 June, during a separate dispute over a proposed burqa ban and the departure of Yusuf as chairman. The reported total fell from 237,099 to 234,175 over that week. <Cite refs={[“turn196394search0″,”turn196394search13”]}/>
That episode illustrates why membership changes should be placed in context. A decline during one controversy does not necessarily explain changes at another point in time, and the reasons members leave may differ.
It also shows why the party’s own membership tracker, while potentially useful, should not be treated as a complete explanation of its political health. The number of registered members does not reveal how active they are, how many volunteer regularly or how their views compare with those of the wider electorate.
For a party seeking to govern, the quality of its organisation matters alongside the size of its membership.
The wider challenge facing Reform
The dispute over Lowe exposed a tension that can emerge when a rapidly expanding political movement attempts to professionalise its operations while retaining the energy of its grassroots supporters.
Growth can bring new resources and visibility, but it also introduces competing personalities, expectations and approaches to political strategy. A movement that once relied on a relatively small circle of loyal figures must eventually develop procedures for managing disagreements and holding its leadership accountable.
Reform also has to balance its desire to attract voters from across the political spectrum with the demands of supporters who want a more uncompromising programme. Those pressures can produce disagreements over candidates, policy and the role of former politicians from other parties.
The leadership’s response will influence whether internal disputes remain isolated episodes or become a recurring feature of the organisation.
Farage must demonstrate that Reform can maintain discipline without discouraging legitimate criticism. Meanwhile, former members who establish rival organisations must prove that their alternatives are capable of achieving more than drawing attention to the party’s disagreements.
A warning sign, not a final verdict
The reported membership decline following Lowe’s expulsion was significant because it highlighted dissatisfaction within part of Reform’s support base at a time when the party was seeking to establish itself as a credible national alternative.
But membership figures alone cannot establish whether Reform’s broader electoral position has weakened. That requires a wider assessment of polling, election results, local organisation and the party’s ability to retain and recruit supporters.
The lasting question is whether Reform can turn its rapid expansion into a stable political organisation capable of handling internal disagreements transparently.
For Farage, the Lowe controversy demonstrated the difficulty of maintaining unity when a prominent figure challenges the leadership. For Reform’s members, it raised questions about fairness, accountability and the party’s future direction. For Lowe, it became part of the background to his attempt to build a rival movement.
The membership numbers may fluctuate, but the organisational challenge remains: a party that wants to govern must persuade supporters not only that its policies are right, but also that its internal processes deserve their confidence.
